elmbury wrote:
NBTMusicRadio wrote:
Broadcasting rights is not the same thing as royalty/Copyright payments; the first is usually taken to mean you have the right to broadcast a show that is exclusively yours.. its a term mostly used in sports broadcasts: for example, one station has the right to broadcast the world cup, while others do not.. i am starting to think that the wording here is deliberately misleading
again only RN management in a matter of seconds can clear this up in a totally unambiguous way.. everything else is guess work
I'm right with NBT on this - someone needs to get radionomy to add a clarification of this phrase. It should be relatively easy to ask the radionomy/Vivendi lawyers to clarify the term in an unambiguous way, and to add that into the Producer Pact.
Note that most other agreements/ToCs/contracts go to great length to define the terms used in an unambiguous way. The Producer Pact has a very brief Definitions section at the front - it would be best to add a full definition of "Broadcasting Rights" and any other terms that may be ambiguous in there.
correct, this is a question that is very easily answered and an issue that is very easily fixed, its also an issue that i cannot think of any reason, why RN would NOT want it fixed, unless it wanted to fool producers in some way, and surely that cannot be their motivation.. since even bring out a new pact implies that they wish to continue this project, why derail it with unclear language which leads to mistrust and unease?
Login
Register
RMO
FAQ
Search
Members
after all you think they would have been alerted to the one artist station thing or promoting Sony Artists on their Facebook page by now too, perhaps the PR staff never came back from that long weekend
